To Talk is Silver But Listening Is Golden
Have you ever tried to convince, win over, “constructively” criticize or set someone straight? How about pleading your own case, adamantly denying, justifying or excusing your less than stellar behavior while condemning another’s? Sure you have, we all have. So, maybe the better question is how did you feel afterwards? Did you accomplish the thing you set out to do? Were those in attendance calmer, more centered and happier than before “the talk?” Was all that verbal passion worth the energy expended? Probably not. It’s likely no one was satisfied with the outcome
As a matter of fact, this type of verbal interaction feels more like engaging in mortal combat and leaves most people frustrated, angry, disappointed or hurt. Neither side walks away from “the talk” tickled pink or pleased as punch. And yet too many of us indulge in this noisy, stressful form of communication.
Some will do so on a regular basis, mostly under the guise of love or concern for another’s well being. But why then do we put ourselves and others through such torture? Is it because we’ve been conditioned to do
so, taught to stand our ground and to voice our opinions no matter what? Did we pledge to never go quietly into the night until all those we are concerned about is on board with our agenda?
If You Talk All The Time, You Can Only Hear Yourself
After all, if we truly want to be understood, to influence or change another’s perception (for their own good) isn’t unrelenting repetition of our thoughts and ideas the only way to get through to them? Yes, that was sarcasm. But doesn’t this technique seem eerily similar to those who operate under the constraints of coercion? And no, I am not harassing or attempting to intimidate you. Remember, you volunteered to listen to my speeches.
But maybe there’s a better question to ask. For instance, what’s in it for the ones doing all the tongue twisting? Maybe it’s the need to feel empowered, or in control. Perhaps the desire to help fix another is just too strong to ignore.
Maybe it’s recognition or favor they are seeking because surely no sane person believes they can make another understand or feel about things exactly the way they do. Awareness, understanding and feelings are solely under the individual’s control.
Aside from the benign reasons most chronic talkers give for engaging others in the way that they do, there is usually a different underlying one. Some will be quite obvious. Others, we may never know.
Listening - Talking = Enlightenment
So, to bring my talk to a close, I’ll end on this note. Governing the tongue is more beneficial then allowing it free reign to cause more harm than good. At the least, you may simply bore the listener. But in a worse case scenario, you may kill a relationship. Doing what is best for self means extending the same courtesy to others. How can we exercise our free will while obstructing the free will of another? After all, how and when others think, relate or understand is not something you can talk them into. Well, I’m so glad we had this talk! Aren’t you? ~♥ Yvonne L. Jones